Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print

Topic: XB9R (RIP) v. XB12R  (Read 1206 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Clive
*

Reputation 0
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: Between bikes, hopefully.
GPS: North Carolina
Miles Typed: 803

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« on: July 12, 2007, 07:46:17 PM »

I was bouncing around in the Buell website and noticed that the "small" Firebolt (XB9R) has been dropped from the 2008 lineup.  It's just the XB12R and the new 1125R in the "sportbike" line.  Got me wondering what performance difference there was to be discerned between the old 9 and 12 bikes.  Spec sheets says the 9 is $1500 less, sheds 10 pounds and gives up 11 hp and 14 ft-lbs.  Otherwise, they look to be identical, even down to the gearing.

Is that 11 hp and/or 14 ft-lbs really that noticeable?  Did the tractability of the smaller engine make it an easier ride?  Or was it under-powered (or more under-powered, if you're a junkie)?
Logged
Members, please login to hide this ad.

Guests, please register to hide this ad.
« on: July 12, 2007, 07:46:17 PM »

 Logged
EZAS
*

Reputation 0
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: 2005 FZ1
Miles Typed: 154

My Photo Gallery




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2007, 08:10:57 PM »

Based on only a couple of short test rides, I like the '9' engine better, it just felt more sorted, a little more willing to rev, a little more willing... if that makes sense.
Logged
Mastros2
*

Reputation 29
Offline Offline

Years Contributed: '09, 10
Years Supported: '11
Motorcycles: 2003 Honda VFR, 2001 Yamaha R6 (track)
GPS: Central NJ
Miles Typed: 3613

My Photo Gallery


Daddy ate all my cookies!




Ignore
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2007, 09:35:08 PM »

I never rode the r but the cityx was a blast to ride. A perfect commuter. I did notice that I had to shift and rev it a bit more than the 12's but that was a characteristic of the bike, not a downfall.
Logged
DannyZRC
*

Reputation 0
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: R1200GS, DR650
Miles Typed: 42

My Photo Gallery




Ignore
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2007, 10:44:34 PM »

the gearing for the 12 and 9 is only the same this year, with the only ongoing 9 model being the city cross xb9sx.

in all previous years, the 9 had a greater gear reduction in the primary chain.
Logged

Witty Sig Here.
Rogue
Menace to Society
*

Reputation -26
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: Buell and Honda
Miles Typed: 6207

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2007, 01:27:47 PM »

I rode both the 9 and 12 R's.

There is a big difference in power all the way across the powerband and in all riding situations.

Realistically, they are both more than adequate for the job.  They can both go 120 mph.  But the 12 gets there quicker with less shifting.
Logged

Rogue
Kootenanny
"Not That Good"
*

Reputation 21
Offline Offline

Years Contributed: '09
Miles Typed: 4077

My Photo Gallery


Buellshit!




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: July 17, 2007, 08:45:35 PM »

This subject has gotten some discussion on the Badweb, and there are guys on both sides of the fence.

I own a 9R, but I've ridden both--prior to buying my 9R, too!  The dealer was definitely trying to sell me a 12R, but I found (and still find) the "9" engine to be more than adequate for my needs.  The general concensus is that the 12R is more powerful, but not as smooth, while the 9R revs more freely (and higher) and somehow seems to be a bit more "eager."  

The "9" engine will remain in production in the CityX, anyways.  
Logged

E=MC2
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  



ST.N

Copyright © 2001 - 2012 Sport-Touring.Net.
All rights reserved.

SimplePortal 2.3.1 © 2008-2009, SimplePortal