Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print

Topic: I like the Sportster 1200R!!!!  (Read 1830 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
rauchman
Capt Ugachaka
*

Reputation 10
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: 2002 Yamaha Roadstar - SOLD / 2007 Suzuki SV1000S
GPS: Teaneck, NJ
Miles Typed: 542

My Photo Gallery




Ignore
« on: November 14, 2007, 05:32:40 AM »

Was in CA a couple of weeks ago and stopped in a HD dealership to see the new Fat Bob (very nice bike).  In perusing the 2008 HD catalog, I came across the 1200R Sportster.  This could be the perfect bike.  I'm coming off a Yamaha Roadstar and am looking for something lighter w/ better brakes, more comfy seat position, but do like the air-cooled V-Twin motor.  The new 1200R comes with a 4.5 gallon tank and dual disc brakes.  This seems like a good starting point to make a great bike.  I could so picture a Buell front end on a Sportster and Buell engine mods, and this would make for a very fun motorcycle.

Thoughts..................
Logged

Don't pee into the wind!!!
Members, please login to hide this ad.

Guests, please register to hide this ad.
« on: November 14, 2007, 05:32:40 AM »

 Logged
1KPerDay
Ride to eat, eat to ride
*

Reputation 4
Offline Offline

Years Supported: '11
Miles Typed: 10093

My Photo Gallery


Arbiter of good taste




Ignore
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2007, 07:00:09 AM »

Cool bike, and yes, if you're coming off a road star it'll be lighter. You can make them handle pretty well with enough money. The solid-mounted ones were better for that IMO.

http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/1KPerDay/Miscellaneous/IMG_0207.jpg
Logged

 No real than you are
hobbes
You and I have memories longer than the road ahead...
*

Reputation 13
Offline Offline

Years Contributed: '07
GPS: Norwalk, CT
Miles Typed: 1539

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2007, 07:03:11 AM »

Peanut tank.  Thumbsdown
Logged
Rincewind
*

Reputation 82
Offline Offline

Years Contributed: '08, '09, '10
Years Supported: '11
Motorcycles: Street Triple R; Gladius
GPS: Lanc, PA
Miles Typed: 12766

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2007, 07:10:18 AM »

I rode and toured on a Sportster awhile back.  Fun bike, nice and thin, moderately flickable.  It will lean pretty good, but it doesn't take a superhero to scrape the pegs.   Suspension is adequate but by no means plush.  You got to be a little hard-headed, maybe even a little crazy, to endure on a Sportster, but it is fun because of that.

Also check the Triumph Thunderbird and Bonnies for comparison - similar bikes. somewhat more civilized/comfortable imo.
Logged
chornbe

« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2007, 07:16:08 AM »


Peanut tank.  Thumbsdown


No, the one he's looking at as the "custom" tank. The peanut tank is an iconic Sportster thing, but I think it's a complete waste of steel. They should all have the larger, MUCH NICER LOOKING, "custom" tank.

$.02
Logged
1KPerDay
Ride to eat, eat to ride
*

Reputation 4
Offline Offline

Years Supported: '11
Miles Typed: 10093

My Photo Gallery


Arbiter of good taste




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2007, 09:01:26 AM »



They should all have the larger, MUCH NICER LOOKING, "custom" tank.

$.02

Hurl Nuts  Twofinger

Just buy a Dyna and be done with it. Lol
Logged

 No real than you are
chornbe

« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2007, 10:08:56 AM »



Hurl Nuts  Twofinger

Just buy a Dyna and be done with it. Lol


Ever tried to hang off and rail a turn on a bike with forward controls? WHOOOOOAAA!!11111oen111one111!!1.

Lol Lol
Logged
Members, please login to hide this ad.

Guests, please register to hide this ad.
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2007, 10:08:56 AM »


 Logged
1KPerDay
Ride to eat, eat to ride
*

Reputation 4
Offline Offline

Years Supported: '11
Miles Typed: 10093

My Photo Gallery


Arbiter of good taste




Ignore
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2007, 10:11:54 AM »

Yes I have, as a matter of fact, and it isn't pretty. Lol BTW several dynas have pegs in the same position as the base sportster, i.e., 'mid-mount.' They're actually pretty forward themselves, kind of like sitting in a rigid chair with your legs at 90-degree angles. Both need rearsets. Thumbsup
Logged

 No real than you are
chornbe

« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2007, 10:35:26 AM »


Yes I have, as a matter of fact, and it isn't pretty. Lol


Yeah, I really shouldn't talk. On the Street Glide, some times I just crawl off and kneel on the floorboard to get it to turn.  Lol Lol


BTW several dynas have pegs in the same position as the base sportster, i.e., 'mid-mount.' They're actually pretty forward themselves, kind of like sitting in a rigid chair with your legs at 90-degree angles. Both need rearsets. Thumbsup


More than just the base model FXD? (which, BTW, is one of their nicest looking bikes ever - very understated. you see the ENGINE as part of the bike, not just a place for all the chrome  Thumbsup )

Logged
1KPerDay
Ride to eat, eat to ride
*

Reputation 4
Offline Offline

Years Supported: '11
Miles Typed: 10093

My Photo Gallery


Arbiter of good taste




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2007, 10:48:44 AM »

Yeah, I owned an FXD (best bike they make IMO) and the 'mid-mounts' need to be further back. As it is your knees splay out into the wind. I often rode with my feet on the passenger pegs on long tours. Crazy

Forward controls feel good around town for about 10 minutes but once you get out on the road the attraction wears off. Pegs should be directly below the butt or slightly forward, IMO. Sport-tourers have it right. Thumbsup
Logged

 No real than you are
chornbe

« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2007, 11:01:54 AM »


Yeah, I owned an FXD (best bike they make IMO) and the 'mid-mounts' need to be further back. As it is your knees splay out into the wind. I often rode with my feet on the passenger pegs on long tours. Crazy

Forward controls feel good around town for about 10 minutes but once you get out on the road the attraction wears off. Pegs should be directly below the butt or slightly forward, IMO. Sport-tourers have it right. Thumbsup


*nods* That's why I like bikes like the 919/599, FZ-6 and the Bandits, etc. The foot pegs are in the right place and the lean forward (if present at all) is crazy minimal. I think some sport tourers are a bit too aggressive in the lean, and some just get the angles all wrong (for me, anyway).
Logged
1KPerDay
Ride to eat, eat to ride
*

Reputation 4
Offline Offline

Years Supported: '11
Miles Typed: 10093

My Photo Gallery


Arbiter of good taste




Ignore
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2007, 11:08:19 AM »



 I think some sport tourers are a bit too aggressive in the lean

That is true... Gen-mars and heli-bars sell like hotcakes for a reason. Bigok
Logged

 No real than you are
chornbe

« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2007, 11:25:49 AM »



That is true... Gen-mars and heli-bars sell like hotcakes for a reason. Bigok


I put Helibars, then ConvertiBars on the F4i. I finally got it to the point where I could ride the bike for a day-long ride without these old bones creaking and complaining and having to drown my sorrows in Advil, and the bike handled like shit if I took a turn more than 30mph. I put the stockers back on. The helibars just weren't that much better.

I don't know why it was different - the 599/Hornet has you in roughly the same place with much more sit-up seating and they don't handle that poorly (and yes, I futzed with the suspension, both ends of the bike, every which way to Sunday).

Now it really is just a weekend toy and frankly, I'd probably trade even up for a 599 or something at this point. I think my low-back issues combined with my general build just aren't made for lean-over bikes.  Sad I gave it the old college try...

The thing is... the F4i is such a mechanically wonderful machine. Near on to perfection.

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  



ST.N

Copyright © 2001 - 2012 Sport-Touring.Net.
All rights reserved.

SimplePortal 2.3.1 © 2008-2009, SimplePortal