>>> Reminder: Please adhere to the forum rules! <<<

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5  All   Go Down
Print

Topic: 2010 Supermoto T  (Read 13616 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
expatbrit
*

Reputation +15/-8
Offline Offline

Years Supported: '11
Motorcycles: A white one
GPS: 'Burque, NM
Miles Typed: 437

My Photo Gallery


Not all who wander are lost. I probably am, though


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #60 on: November 22, 2009, 06:22:14 PM »

So...

Is it me, or does KTM list the weights differently than other manufacturers.

423lbs without fuel, as opposed to 440, or whatever, for the MTS1200 'dry'

Given how much my Sprint goes up from 'dry' to 'ready', if that's just adding 5gal of fuel
is the Katoom that much lighter than the MTS?
Logged
Members, please login to hide this ad.

Guests, please register to hide this ad.
« Reply #60 on: November 22, 2009, 06:22:14 PM »

 Logged
some_finn
*

Reputation +0/-0
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: KTM 990 SM T, Kawasaki W650, Husqvarna TE 610ie
GPS: Finland
Miles Typed: 9

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #61 on: November 23, 2009, 07:31:12 AM »


The world's most expensive V-Strom.


It's painfully obvious you haven't tried the KTM...
Even by the specs: The V-Strom's dry weight is nearly the same as the Katooms curb weight, and of course the Brembo brakes and WP suspension are way higher spec etc.
Go test ride both and then try to convince yourself again they are the same  Wink
Logged
some_finn
*

Reputation +0/-0
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: KTM 990 SM T, Kawasaki W650, Husqvarna TE 610ie
GPS: Finland
Miles Typed: 9

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #62 on: November 23, 2009, 07:42:03 AM »



Is it me, or does KTM list the weights differently than other manufacturers.



There are many ways... For example BMW's "dry weight" means "without fluids" so apparently it includes the battery which many manufacturer's don't include in the "dry weight".
On the Ducati MTS1200 page here it says the dry weight is 417 lbs for the basic model and 423 for Sport and Touring models. So it looks like the MTS is a bit heavier but not quite as much as you suspected.
Logged
expatbrit
*

Reputation +15/-8
Offline Offline

Years Supported: '11
Motorcycles: A white one
GPS: 'Burque, NM
Miles Typed: 437

My Photo Gallery


Not all who wander are lost. I probably am, though


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #63 on: November 26, 2009, 09:50:46 AM »




There are many ways... For example BMW's "dry weight" means "without fluids" so apparently it includes the battery which many manufacturer's don't include in the "dry weight".
On the Ducati MTS1200 page here it says the dry weight is 417 lbs for the basic model and 423 for Sport and Touring models. So it looks like the MTS is a bit heavier but not quite as much as you suspected.


Yeah. I thought a lot of places were 'dry' was no battery, no fluids, no nothing. (Again, witness the 100lbs or close to my Sprint gains from 'dry' to 'wet' weights. I'm not altogether sure how Ducati rates their 'dry'.

Ah well. I don't think  can afford an MTS1200S, and I can't find a KTM dealer to even sit on a 990 SM.
Logged
vulcanbill
You don't know me
*

Reputation +3/-5
Offline Offline

Years Contributed: '09
Years Supported: '11
Motorcycles: 04 B12S and a borrowed Y2KVFR
GPS: Frederick County, MD
Miles Typed: 2355

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #64 on: February 19, 2010, 07:18:18 AM »

I was just told that the KTM truck will be at JT Motorsports in April 3.   Bigsmile
Logged
kendenton
You ain't a beauty, but hey you're alright
*

Reputation +35/-4
Offline Offline

Years Contributed: '07, '08, '10
Years Supported: '11
Motorcycles: 2006 Ducati Multistrada 620, 1991 Kawasaki Zephyr 750
Miles Typed: 2885

My Photo Gallery



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #65 on: February 19, 2010, 07:21:25 AM »

That's a bit far for me for a demo.... but I'm tempted.
Logged

garry
Bleeds Orange...
*

Reputation +64/-12
Offline Offline

Years Contributed: '08, '09
Motorcycles: KTM 950 SMR / KTM 530 EXC
GPS: Southwestern PA
Miles Typed: 4864

My Photo Gallery



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #66 on: February 19, 2010, 10:24:11 AM »


So...

Is it me, or does KTM list the weights differently than other manufacturers.

423lbs without fuel, as opposed to 440, or whatever, for the MTS1200 'dry'

Given how much my Sprint goes up from 'dry' to 'ready', if that's just adding 5gal of fuel
is the Katoom that much lighter than the MTS?


I believe there is a move among mfgrs to list "curb weight" which is ready to ride, but no fuel (or something close to that). That way mfgrs don't get dinged for offering a 5 gallon tank versus a 3.5 gallon one.
Logged

2007 KTM 950 SMR
2009 KTM 530 EXC
http://www.motoroads.net
Members, please login to hide this ad.

Guests, please register to hide this ad.
« Reply #66 on: February 19, 2010, 10:24:11 AM »


 Logged
expatbrit
*

Reputation +15/-8
Offline Offline

Years Supported: '11
Motorcycles: A white one
GPS: 'Burque, NM
Miles Typed: 437

My Photo Gallery


Not all who wander are lost. I probably am, though


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #67 on: February 19, 2010, 01:01:32 PM »

That's be smart, I think. At least then you can easily compare and figure it all out.
Logged
AV8OR
*

Reputation +10/-0
Offline Offline

Miles Typed: 227

My Photo Gallery


30 mike mike




Ignore
« Reply #68 on: March 19, 2010, 11:09:58 AM »

so any more news?
Logged

Hawg!!
mugwump58
*

Reputation +26/-23
Offline Offline

Years Contributed: '08, '09, '10
Years Supported: '11
Motorcycles: EX 500, KLX 300 SF, FJR
GPS: 43.4582N-76.5210W
Miles Typed: 2436

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #69 on: March 19, 2010, 04:33:47 PM »


I saw $13,998 as the official price.

The question is ... 'when'!?


And where. I think I'll spend the evening and see if there is even a KTM "street" dealer left in the state.
Logged

In the UK my bike would've come with heated carbs...Oswego Weather
FizDog74
*

Reputation +1/-0
Offline Offline

Years Contributed: '08, '09
Motorcycles: 2005 FZ1 (sold), 2008 K1200GT
GPS: Ellicott City Maryland
Miles Typed: 975

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #70 on: April 05, 2010, 06:24:39 AM »


I was just told that the KTM truck will be at JT Motorsports in April 3.   Bigsmile



I was there, and the bike is simply awesome to ride. Super comfy and relaxed ergos, good wind protection, light handling and one of the best transmissions I've experienced on a bike.

http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k181/FizDog74/mail.jpg

The fuel delivery was flawless too. What I can't understand though is why it is so good on this bike and the Super Duke, but so horrible on the 990 Adventure I also test rode the same day.  Shrug I have never experienced such horrendous on/off fueling as I did on the Adventure.

Logged
R Doug
*

Reputation +99/-32
Online Online

Years Contributed: '06, '07, '08, '09, '10
Years Supported: '11
Motorcycles: 990 Adventure & GSX-R 750
GPS: Clemmons, North Carolina
Miles Typed: 9191

My Photo Gallery



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #71 on: April 05, 2010, 08:00:00 AM »


What I can't understand though is why it is so good on this bike and the Super Duke, but so horrible on the 990 Adventure I also test rode the same day.  Shrug I have never experienced such horrendous on/off fueling as I did on the Adventure.



The Adventure's EFI delivery is pretty bad.  Like you, I can't understand how the other KTM 990 road bikes are fine and the Adventure is so wrong.  
Logged

"For my part, I travel not to go anywhere, but to go. I travel for travel's sake. The great affair is to move."  - Robert Louis Stevenson

"Being shot out of a cannon will always be better than being squeezed out of a tube. That is why God made fast motorcycles, Bubba." - Hunter S. Thompson
FizDog74
*

Reputation +1/-0
Offline Offline

Years Contributed: '08, '09
Motorcycles: 2005 FZ1 (sold), 2008 K1200GT
GPS: Ellicott City Maryland
Miles Typed: 975

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #72 on: April 05, 2010, 08:23:08 AM »




The Adventure's EFI delivery is pretty bad.  Like you, I can't understand how the other KTM 990 road bikes are fine and the Adventure is so wrong.  


The last Adventure I rode was a 950 with all of the smog crap removed and was smooth like butta'. I have to say after Saturday, that I think I would be looking for an '06 950 with carbs.
Logged
R Doug
*

Reputation +99/-32
Online Online

Years Contributed: '06, '07, '08, '09, '10
Years Supported: '11
Motorcycles: 990 Adventure & GSX-R 750
GPS: Clemmons, North Carolina
Miles Typed: 9191

My Photo Gallery



WWW

Ignore
« Reply #73 on: April 05, 2010, 08:30:06 AM »

Though the Adventure's throttle is on/off-ish.  It's not been to the level of annoyance for me to do anyting about it.  I have read that a new cam throttle is a BIG help and performing the "canisterectomy" is another help.  I  can't speak to their effectiveness because I have not completed either one.  

What I can say is that with the addition of the Renazco Racing seat, the Adventure is as comfy as a Big GS.  The seat makes the bike nearly perfect for touring.   Inlove

RideWV had my Super Duke all day last Saturday with the exception of about 40 miles on the Adventure.  We agreed that the SM-T would most likely be the perfect blend of both bikes.  
Logged

"For my part, I travel not to go anywhere, but to go. I travel for travel's sake. The great affair is to move."  - Robert Louis Stevenson

"Being shot out of a cannon will always be better than being squeezed out of a tube. That is why God made fast motorcycles, Bubba." - Hunter S. Thompson
Members, please login to hide this ad.

Guests, please register to hide this ad.
« Reply #73 on: April 05, 2010, 08:30:06 AM »


 Logged
FizDog74
*

Reputation +1/-0
Offline Offline

Years Contributed: '08, '09
Motorcycles: 2005 FZ1 (sold), 2008 K1200GT
GPS: Ellicott City Maryland
Miles Typed: 975

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #74 on: April 05, 2010, 09:31:47 AM »



RideWV had my Super Duke all day last Saturday with the exception of about 40 miles on the Adventure.  We agreed that the SM-T would most likely be the perfect blend of both bikes.  


If dirt was no consideration, it would be the obvious choice after riding them all back to back this weekend.
Logged
Hotbrakes
*

Reputation +6/-9
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: Super Duke, VFR800, KTM 450EXC, CBR1000RR, CBR600RR
GPS: Beaverdam, VA
Miles Typed: 504

My Photo Gallery


No Wing, No Prayer




Ignore
« Reply #75 on: April 05, 2010, 06:45:51 PM »





I was there, and the bike is simply awesome to ride. Super comfy and relaxed ergos, good wind protection, light handling and one of the best transmissions I've experienced on a bike.

http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k181/FizDog74/mail.jpg

The fuel delivery was flawless too. What I can't understand though is why it is so good on this bike and the Super Duke, but so horrible on the 990 Adventure I also test rode the same day.  Shrug I have never experienced such horrendous on/off fueling as I did on the Adventure.


How did you snap the pic with the guy I was standing next to in line and didn't get me?  Haha...wish I had known there were other STN'ers out there.  
My GF and I both rode the SMT.  What an amazing, comfy bike!  It definitely lived up to my expectations although the factory bags are teeny.  It has a very upright seating position with high bars and still retains a flickable chassis that mimics the SD.  But as long as I have a VFR and SD that combined cost me a little over half of a new SMT I'll be sticking with them.  KTM is doing a fine job of building phenomenal street bikes whose quality is much higher than the Japanese counterparts but those prices are a bit steep.
The RC8 was very comfortable as well but there was only one available to demo and we didn't have enough time to wait.  
Logged

FizDog74
*

Reputation +1/-0
Offline Offline

Years Contributed: '08, '09
Motorcycles: 2005 FZ1 (sold), 2008 K1200GT
GPS: Ellicott City Maryland
Miles Typed: 975

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #76 on: April 06, 2010, 08:18:53 AM »

Ha! I figured someone from this forum had to be there. Sorry I missed you. I agree the price is a bit steep, but most euro bikes are these days. A slightly used one a year or two from now wouldn't be out of the question though.  Bigsmile
Logged
Spiffious
*

Reputation +0/-0
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: 2005 Sv1000s (for sale), 2009 1125cr, 2004 VFR800
GPS: Greencastle, PA
Miles Typed: 523

My Photo Gallery


I love Buell Pods




Ignore
« Reply #77 on: April 10, 2010, 04:03:28 PM »





I was there, and the bike is simply awesome to ride. Super comfy and relaxed ergos, good wind protection, light handling and one of the best transmissions I've experienced on a bike.

http://i88.photobucket.com/albums/k181/FizDog74/mail.jpg





lol....  I was there too.  The guy in the blue jacket is a buddy that went with me.  I had just gotten through the line.  I took the black Buell 1125cr that was parked there... I think I saw the STN VFR there.    

I didn't ride the SMT, but I did ride the SD990, and the RC8.  The RC8 was amazingly comfortable... beautiful bike.  I was surprised to find my 1125 felt revvier and faster SOTP on the ride home.  But I did love the KTMs.
Logged
atadaskew
*

Reputation +73/-65
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: Thcooters
GPS: Venice Beach, California.
Miles Typed: 10940

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #78 on: April 16, 2010, 03:52:07 PM »




The Adventure's EFI delivery is pretty bad.  Like you, I can't understand how the other KTM 990 road bikes are fine and the Adventure is so wrong.  


The one I demoed a while back was horrendous.  Also surgy on a constant throttle.  And I wanted that bike until then.  I keep hearing about fixes, but this begs the question as to why the factory/dealerships/whoever don't fix it before the public gets their hands on them.
Logged

Børk! Børk! Børk!
Kraz
Jack of all trades, master of none.
*

Reputation +16/-8
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: KLRE in hibernation
GPS: Bahrain
Miles Typed: 1364

My Photo Gallery


I don't ride much.




Ignore
« Reply #79 on: March 19, 2011, 08:27:43 PM »

This bike looks like the total package.   Thumbsup

I've heard bad maintenance/reliability stories about KTM's and don't really think that's something I want to get into - but I really like the bike - it may be worth the leap.  Good to hear the fueling is right though - I figured it'd be similar to some other KTM's, which I heard was horrible.

Either way, 14 g's (is that with bags?) is a bit high for me - but certainly isn't out of line with the rest of the market.

EDIT: Sat on one - not bad - Adventure seems better and more like a do-it-all for me...
« Last Edit: April 09, 2011, 09:24:12 PM by Kraz » Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5  All   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  



ST.N

Copyright © 2001 - 2011 Sport-Touring.Net.
All rights reserved.

SimplePortal 2.3.1 © 2008-2009, SimplePortal