Welcome to ST.N
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 26, 2012, 11:14:23 AM
"I'll be honest, we're throwing science at the wall here to see what sticks."
Home
Forums
Photo Gallery
Login
Register
Shop @ MG.C
Shop @ ST.N
Contact
Sport-Touring.Net
»
The Club House
»
Manufacturer Row
»
Buell
» Topic:
Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
4
5
All
Go Down
Print
Topic: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell (Read 9520 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Rogue
Menace to Society
Reputation -26
Offline
Motorcycles: Buell and Honda
Miles Typed: 6207
My Photo Gallery
Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
on:
March 12, 2007, 04:59:34 PM »
I just read an article from one of the UK Bike mags, wherein they interviewed Erik. One of the most interesting parts was about the engine on the current XB. These are not direct quotes from Erik but here is what he had to say.
The
liquid cooled V-Rod motor
was originally a Buell design. H-D told Erik that Buell would have primary user of this motor, with H-D secondary. Somewhere along the way, H-D changed their mind and wanted to be the primary user. H-D took the design in-house, then sub-contracted the rest to Porsche. That's when the motor became big, heavy, and complicated.
Erik decided NOT to use this motor on the XB due to its size and weight. The design goal for the XB engine was around 140 lbs. The liquid cooled V-Rod motor weighs in at a porky 220 lbs. Erik said no thanks.
Buell designed
the 1203 cc motor for the XB
. H-D did NOT have a hand in it. However, H-D liked the design so much, they asked to be secondary users of it. Thus, H-D uses the block and heads and some other parts on the Sportster 1200. The rest are all different. Erik really likes this motor. He believes it still has a lot of potential. It currently meets present and emissions standards WITHOU a catalyst. Therefore, it can easily meet future emissions standards with no problem. It is lightweight, simple, and has plenty of power for its given applications. Erik does not believe in the need for very high horsepower motors with high RPM thresholds. He believes it is rarely used in the street so the benefit of added power is overcome by its heavier weight, complexity, and cost.
Logged
Rogue
Members, please
login
to hide this ad.
Guests, please
register
to hide this ad.
Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
on:
March 12, 2007, 04:59:34 PM »
Logged
CBRXXBLACKBIRD
Reputation 9
Offline
Motorcycles: 2003 Wing, 06 Triumph Daytona.
GPS: 42.61N -87.86W (Elev. 672 ft)
Miles Typed: 3566
My Photo Gallery
Stealth Wing rider
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #1 on:
March 13, 2007, 05:19:09 AM »
I wish their were more of these bikes around I would love to hear one of the 1203 with after market exhaust.
Logged
Joe.
"I must finally be hitting my 2nd gear shift right, the *&$@! oil light keeps coming on..."
Asphalt_Carver
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #2 on:
March 13, 2007, 06:32:08 AM »
Rogue,
It is my sincere hope that everyone who unilaterally bashes the Buell motor reads your post and somehow manages to find a clue. Buells are designed for a specific purpose, exceptional handling, and the motor chosen is the one that fits the given design parameters.
Basically, I think that everyone who bashes Buells should really understand that if Erik had wanted a different motor, he would have gotten one. Instead, he chose a design that did what he wanted and the hell with the detractors!
Logged
Thor
Reputation 10
Offline
Motorcycles: '02 ZX9
Miles Typed: 699
My Photo Gallery
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #3 on:
March 13, 2007, 07:34:14 AM »
I don't buy it. Eric started his design, while working at Harley, with a square four motor from England. If the Harley motor is so great, why didn't he use one? It would have been a lot easier, don't you think?
http://www.motorcycle.com/mo/mcbuell/buellinterview6_95.html
He uses Harley engines because Harley owns Buell. Harley is a motor company. The motor is their thing.
I like mechanical watches. They are anywhere from 2 to 8 seconds off a day and require expensive service every 5 years or so. They are also very expensive to purchase. Just because I like them doesn't mean I'm going to try to convince anyone that they are technological marvels. They're not. I just like them.
The Harley engine is like my mechanical watches.
Logged
Asphalt_Carver
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #4 on:
March 13, 2007, 07:39:26 AM »
As a Rolex owner, I would not compare my Buell to a mechanical watch. Erik got what he wanted and to those who understand his philosophy, Buells are a joy to ride. To those who don't understand the allure and appeal of a Buell, that's ok too. Part of the joy of motorcycling is that there is enough choice out there to satisfy just about everyone.
For me, that means a Buell Lightning!
Logged
jschmidt
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #5 on:
March 13, 2007, 07:48:51 AM »
Sounds like the manager saying he controls the owners. "Harley asked to use it..." C'mon.
Logged
Rogue
Menace to Society
Reputation -26
Offline
Motorcycles: Buell and Honda
Miles Typed: 6207
My Photo Gallery
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #6 on:
March 13, 2007, 08:08:27 AM »
I don't understand some of you people who just don't like H-D. I really don't. You always find something to bash.
Anyway, nobody is saying that Erik could have done ANYTHING he wanted and could have gotten whatever he wanted. You people work for a company right? Well, even if you are the top man of your division, you still can't do and get whatever you want. You need to work within certain constraints. Hello people.....this is reality not reality TV.
So of course Erik had to work with what was available to him. He set a target and designed something that met that target within the parameters he had at the time. The parameters being, he had to share the motor with H-D. It allows Buell to take advantage of shared costs, which in turn allows them to sell their bikes at comptetitive price points. It all makes business sense.
Some of you will NEVER understand the allure of the big cube, aircooled V-twin. Your loss.
Logged
Rogue
Members, please
login
to hide this ad.
Guests, please
register
to hide this ad.
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #6 on:
March 13, 2007, 08:08:27 AM »
Logged
PlayWithGravity
Reputation 0
Offline
Motorcycles: 06 Buell Firebolt
GPS: Raleigh, NC
Miles Typed: 176
My Photo Gallery
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #7 on:
March 13, 2007, 08:19:14 AM »
Quote from: CBRXXBLACKBIRD on March 13, 2007, 05:19:09 AM
I wish their were more of these bikes around I would love to hear one of the 1203 with after market exhaust.
Too bad we don't live closer!
Weigh in: I dig my Buell, partially because it's not 'mainstream'. Every time you look up you see a jap racer (no offense intended), which makes the Buell different, and to me - enjoyable even more. The motor does the trick for me, too. thump-thump-thump WHOOO-PAAAA
Logged
Zoom - zoom = -
steve.ski
Cautious Optimist
Reputation 12
Offline
Years Contributed: '07
GPS: Southern California
Miles Typed: 2502
My Photo Gallery
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #8 on:
March 13, 2007, 08:48:08 AM »
Quote from: Thor on March 13, 2007, 07:34:14 AM
I like mechanical watches. They are anywhere from 2 to 8 seconds off a day and require expensive service every 5 years or so. They are also very expensive to purchase. Just because I like them doesn't mean I'm going to try to convince anyone that they are technological marvels. They're not. I just like them.
The Harley engine is like my mechanical watches.
Thor, if your watches are 2-8 seconds off per day, it's time to have them regulated.
Rogue is right. Erik's engine project was redirected and gained weight. So goes the corporate path...
Furthermore, his bikes have always been about bucking trends, and the aircooled engine he uses in his bikes fits the bill. Of course the bike may be faster in the 1/4 with a different engine design, but it's not about that. The XB is a marvel of simplicity, and I think hanging a radiator on it would detract from the overall design.
Buell has come a LONG way in looks, design, and reliability. I really like their bikes, and since I have ridden with Rogue and Asphalt Carver, I can tell you they haul ass
Logged
Pending something meaningful to be said.
2000 Honda VFR800 FI 2000 Honda CR250R 1974 Suzuki TS 185 Six Packer 1987 Yamaha Warrior 350 Wifey's Quad 2004 Yamaha Raptor 50: Nate's Quad 2004 Suz
CBRXXBLACKBIRD
Reputation 9
Offline
Motorcycles: 2003 Wing, 06 Triumph Daytona.
GPS: 42.61N -87.86W (Elev. 672 ft)
Miles Typed: 3566
My Photo Gallery
Stealth Wing rider
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #9 on:
March 13, 2007, 08:51:18 AM »
Quote from: PlayWithGravity on March 13, 2007, 08:19:14 AM
Too bad we don't live closer!
Weigh in: I dig my Buell, partially because it's not 'mainstream'. Every time you look up you see a jap racer (no offense intended), which makes the Buell different, and to me - enjoyable even more. The motor does the trick for me, too. thump-thump-thump WHOOO-PAAAA
Check out this link how far is this for you?
http://www.sport-touring.net/forums/index.php/topic,2737.0.html
Logged
Joe.
"I must finally be hitting my 2nd gear shift right, the *&$@! oil light keeps coming on..."
PlayWithGravity
Reputation 0
Offline
Motorcycles: 06 Buell Firebolt
GPS: Raleigh, NC
Miles Typed: 176
My Photo Gallery
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #10 on:
March 13, 2007, 09:19:01 AM »
The moonshine? I've never been, but I've put in on my calendar for this year. It's about 450 miles of slab from my home in Ohio, and 750 miles from where I'll likely be living by then (Raleigh, NC). We'll see, though... you never know....
Logged
Zoom - zoom = -
GS1100GK
Reputation 0
Offline
Motorcycles: KAW C-14 ABS, KAW ZZR1200, Suzuki GS1100GK
Miles Typed: 226
My Photo Gallery
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #11 on:
March 13, 2007, 09:49:38 AM »
I agree that from an engineering perspective, Eric Buell has done a masterful job with the 1203 Engine. Even though it is not the latest design it fits the bill. That engine is narrow and short which allows for the short wheelbase that Eric wanted to make the bikes nimble. Eric solved the vib issue with the rubber mounting system that HD couldn't or wouldn't do in over 40+ years up until the 2004 Sportster hit the street. Erick was also the first to fuel inject the 1203 to help it's performance even more. Other than the pushrod design Eric has made the 1203 motor a very modern engine.
I also agree that the HD engines have gotten a bad rap for being old school pushrod engines. Alot of that bad rap has to do with the poor quality that HD had in the past and the meager HP that their engines produced. Consider this, the BMW Boxer motor is also a pushrod design that is over 80 years old, yet I do not hear anyone complaining about the design of that motor. Kawasaki uses pushrods in their Vulcan 2000 motor, Yamaha has pushrods in their biggest Star Line bikes and again no one complains about that.
Eric Buell should be commended for reinventing the 1203 Motor!
Logged
Flat-Out
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #12 on:
March 13, 2007, 09:58:16 AM »
Quote from: Thor on March 13, 2007, 07:34:14 AM
The Harley engine is like my mechanical watches.
Good comparison
Logged
PlayWithGravity
Reputation 0
Offline
Motorcycles: 06 Buell Firebolt
GPS: Raleigh, NC
Miles Typed: 176
My Photo Gallery
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #13 on:
March 13, 2007, 10:02:25 AM »
It's a good thing my watch doesn't clatter and shake as much as my bike
Logged
Zoom - zoom = -
Members, please
login
to hide this ad.
Guests, please
register
to hide this ad.
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #13 on:
March 13, 2007, 10:02:25 AM »
Logged
hobbes
You and I have memories longer than the road ahead...
Reputation 13
Offline
Years Contributed: '07
GPS: Norwalk, CT
Miles Typed: 1539
My Photo Gallery
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #14 on:
March 13, 2007, 10:28:35 AM »
Quote from: Rogue on March 12, 2007, 04:59:34 PM
designed
the 1203 cc motor for the XB
. H-D did NOT have a hand in it. However, H-D liked the design so much, they asked to be secondary users of it. Thus, H-D uses the block and heads and some other parts on the Sportster 1200. The rest are all different. Erik really likes this motor. He believes it still has a lot of potential. It currently meets present and emissions standards WITHOU a catalyst. Therefore, it can easily meet future emissions standards with no problem. It is lightweight, simple, and has plenty of power for its given applications. Erik does not believe in the need for very high horsepower motors with high RPM thresholds. He believes it is rarely used in the street so the benefit of added power is overcome by its heavier weight, complexity, and cost.
That's a bunch of crap. Not the info, but the way you put it. Erik Buell didn't design the 1203 engine, he MODIFIED an existing design. Most of the internal parts are different, but the original design came from Hardley.
I have faith in Buell's design ideas, but he has yet to really build a successfull engine from the ground up. Where's his square 4 now?
Logged
bizarro
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #15 on:
March 13, 2007, 10:38:35 AM »
Quote from: Rogue on March 13, 2007, 08:08:27 AM
Some of you will NEVER understand the allure of the big cube, aircooled V-twin.
Absolutely correct.
Quote
Your loss, IMHO.
Fixed that for you.
I've ridden a number of twins. Parallel, opposed, V, L. They're just not my cup o' tea. In line triples are, however. But I'm glad you dig your bike, it would suck if you spent a pile of money on something and decided it wasn't for you (ala my experience with BMWs).
Logged
PlayWithGravity
Reputation 0
Offline
Motorcycles: 06 Buell Firebolt
GPS: Raleigh, NC
Miles Typed: 176
My Photo Gallery
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #16 on:
March 13, 2007, 10:44:29 AM »
Quote from: bizarro on March 13, 2007, 10:38:35 AM
They're just not my cup o' tea. In line triples are, however. But I'm glad you dig your bike, it would suck if you spent a pile of money on something and decided it wasn't for you (ala my experience with BMWs).
What a pleasant way to disagree. Thanks for not bashing. Appreciated.
Logged
Zoom - zoom = -
bizarro
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #17 on:
March 13, 2007, 10:45:55 AM »
I make an attempt towards civility when I leave the dungeon.
Logged
Mookie
1/31/07 Never forget
Reputation -343
Offline
Years Contributed: '07, '10
Motorcycles: Slotard and a Duke
GPS: land of the sea chickens
Miles Typed: 7787
My Photo Gallery
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #18 on:
March 13, 2007, 10:48:00 AM »
Quote from: Asphalt_Carver on March 13, 2007, 06:32:08 AM
Basically, I think that everyone who bashes Buells should really understand that if Erik had wanted a different motor, he would have gotten one. Instead, he chose a design that did what he wanted and the hell with the detractors!
I call BS on that. Erik DID want a different motor and it wasn't given to him. He modified an existing, somewhat crappy motor to get around it's inherent disadvantages.
I happen to really like the XB series of bikes, including the motors to some degree. I love big chunky VTwins, even aircooled ones. I like the idea of torquing around at 4 RPM and getting 50 MPG But the engine is without a doubt it's biggest limiting factor (and the transmission).
Logged
CBRXXBLACKBIRD
Reputation 9
Offline
Motorcycles: 2003 Wing, 06 Triumph Daytona.
GPS: 42.61N -87.86W (Elev. 672 ft)
Miles Typed: 3566
My Photo Gallery
Stealth Wing rider
Re: Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
«
Reply #19 on:
March 13, 2007, 10:52:00 AM »
Buells take some getting used to but they are fun to ride.
Logged
Joe.
"I must finally be hitting my 2nd gear shift right, the *&$@! oil light keeps coming on..."
Pages: [
1
]
2
3
4
5
All
Go Up
Print
Sport-Touring.Net
»
The Club House
»
Manufacturer Row
»
Buell
» Topic:
Why The Sportster Engine?...according to Erik Buell
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Administration
-----------------------------
=> Announcements & Rules
-----------------------------
The Open Road
-----------------------------
=> General Sport-Touring Discussion
=> Ride Reports
=> Motorcycle Polls
=> Beginner's Garage
=> ST.N Rallies/Meets
===> STN National
===> Borscht Burn
===> ESTN
===> SNOB
===> WCRM
-----------------------------
The Club House
-----------------------------
=> Pit Row
=> Iron Butt
=> Dirt Lovers
===> Off Road Ride Reports
=> Manufacturer Row
===> Aprilia
===> BMW
===> Buell
===> Ducati
===> Harley-Davidson
===> Honda
===> Kawasaki
===> KTM
===> Moto Guzzi
===> Suzuki
===> Triumph
===> Yamaha
===> Other
-----------------------------
The Tech Zone
-----------------------------
=> Mods & Maintenance
=> Gadgets
=> Gear and Apparel
-----------------------------
Global Positioning
-----------------------------
=> U.S. Region 1
=> U.S. Region 2
=> U.S. Region 3
=> U.S. Region 4
=> U.S. Region 5
=> U.S. Region 6
=> Canada
=> Europe & U.K.
=> Australia & New Zealand
-----------------------------
The Marketplace
-----------------------------
=> Bike Tech
=> Bikes Only
=> Non-bike Items
=> Vendor, Group Buy, Member Offers
-----------------------------
The Lounge
-----------------------------
=> Off Topic Discussion
=> EOE: Experts On Everything
Loading...
Copyright © 2001 - 2012 Sport-Touring.Net.
All rights reserved.
SimplePortal 2.3.1 © 2008-2009, SimplePortal