Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print

Topic: SportRider's CB1000R test - brutally honest...  (Read 1273 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
atadaskew
*

Reputation 9
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: Two Vethpas and thome other thcooters
GPS: Venice Beach, California.
Miles Typed: 11353

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« on: January 11, 2012, 01:32:32 PM »

http://www.sportrider.com/bikes/146_1112_2011_honda_cb1000r_full_test/index.html

This is the first test I've read by a US rag that actually criticizes this bike.
I've read similar comments from the Euros but thought that maybe the bike had been 'improved' for the US market.

Basically they love the canyon handling, but are disappointed with the suspension, surging fueling, comfort and higher speed instability.

Some of it would seem to be relatively easy to fix - an aftermarket FI controller, a steering damper, new springs but it still seems to be a bit of a disappointment given the time it has taken this bike to get to the US, and the quality of its competition.
Logged

I'm hip about time, I just gotta go.
Members, please login to hide this ad.

Guests, please register to hide this ad.
« on: January 11, 2012, 01:32:32 PM »

 Logged
Rincewind
*

Reputation 82
Offline Offline

Years Contributed: '08, '09, '10
Years Supported: '11
Motorcycles: Street Triple R; Gladius
GPS: Lanc, PA
Miles Typed: 12770

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2012, 10:16:19 AM »


 a bit of a disappointment


My feelings on Honda recently, too.  However, I'm glad to see they will still offer this CB in 2012, so it's not just a one-year wonder.  But still there are no color options and no ABS, like a black sheep in the US line-up.  
Logged
jeepinbanditrider
Junior Member
*

Reputation 5
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: 04 FJR1300A, 79 Suzuki GS1000
GPS: NAS JRB Fort Worth
Miles Typed: 1053

My Photo Gallery


Alright Meow!


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2012, 12:23:34 PM »


http://www.sportrider.com/bikes/146_1112_2011_honda_cb1000r_full_test/index.html

This is the first test I've read by a US rag that actually criticizes this bike.
I've read similar comments from the Euros but thought that maybe the bike had been 'improved' for the US market.

Basically they love the canyon handling, but are disappointed with the suspension, surging fueling, comfort and higher speed instability.

Some of it would seem to be relatively easy to fix - an aftermarket FI controller, a steering damper, new springs but it still seems to be a bit of a disappointment given the time it has taken this bike to get to the US, and the quality of its competition.


I'd argue that that's stuff that I shouldn't have to jack with on a brand new bike from the factory.  I shouldn't have to be putting a FI programer on a bike that is fully stock from the factory.
Logged

1979 GS1000
2000 Suzuki Bandit 1200 (Gone but not forgotten)
2002 BMW R1150R(gone) 2004 FJR1300A WWBOC MEMBER #2055
atadaskew
*

Reputation 9
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: Two Vethpas and thome other thcooters
GPS: Venice Beach, California.
Miles Typed: 11353

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2012, 01:27:54 PM »

The problem I have with the instability issues on the freeway is that it shows something is seriously off with the chassis.  The steering damper fix just masks it.  Most bikes that use steering dampers have them because they are needed for extreme circumstances i.e. track use, where the bike is used near to its maximum capability or extreme road use.
 
Cruising down a freeway is not that.
 
Which makes one think that Honda used such a de-tuned motor (the donor bike it came from made about 30 hp more) because the chassis cannot handle anymore.
Logged

I'm hip about time, I just gotta go.
Joey Stalin
sick of pictures of gas stations
*

Reputation 16
Offline Offline

GPS: nOvA
Miles Typed: 1817

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2012, 01:39:58 PM »

These manufacturers sell sport bikes like hotcakes. Why can't they just fill the market need with a streetfighter version of the same bike? Minimal, minimal investment. Dumb down the fairing to basically a headlight and turn signals. Add bar risers. Drop footpegs a little bit. Voila. You've just added $500 worth of aftermarket parts and created a whole new model. Sure it's not the best naked, but it's ridiculously low investment. You could even sell it as a dealer-added option package. Some people want nakeds to be torque monsters. Well the 06 and newer FZ1 was a "detuned" Yamaha R1 motor and it still makes all of its power up top. And that bike sells pretty well.
Logged

Joseph "Joey" Stalin
BMW R1100RT-P
Kawasaki KLR650
gritsngravy
*

Reputation -17
Offline Offline

Miles Typed: 894

My Photo Gallery


Motors: BKing! - VFR




Ignore
« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2012, 09:31:37 PM »

I checked this bike out and indeed does look great but for me it  just felt small and compact for my  large 6 ft frame.   Too bad about some of the reported "problems" that the sportrider crew ran into.    Of course these same experts were whining about windblast at speed on a naked bike so for me their credibility is not all it could be.    Windblast?  On a naked bike?   The horror!   Kudos to Honda for bringing it in despite tough market    conditions and the oh so perfect competition out there.    Lol    
Logged
atadaskew
*

Reputation 9
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: Two Vethpas and thome other thcooters
GPS: Venice Beach, California.
Miles Typed: 11353

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2012, 10:49:31 AM »


I checked this bike out and indeed does look great but for me it  just felt small and compact for my  large 6 ft frame.   Too bad about some of the reported "problems" that the sportrider crew ran into.    Of course these same experts were whining about windblast at speed on a naked bike so for me their credibility is not all it could be.    Windblast?  On a naked bike?   The horror!   Kudos to Honda for bringing it in despite tough market    conditions and the oh so perfect competition out there.    Lol    


This is what they said about the wind blast, which does not seem like an unreasonable statement:

Quote

Wind protection is on par with most of the other naked bikes we have tested this year. The feel when confronted with extreme headwinds is best compared to that of the Yamaha FZ8, which features a similar triangulated headlight. At cruising speeds especially, the windblasts emanating off the front cowl are manageable, but it becomes a chore to hang on once speeds creep past the 75 mph mark


The actual problems about instability, surging motor etc are very real and unacceptable .
Logged

I'm hip about time, I just gotta go.
Members, please login to hide this ad.

Guests, please register to hide this ad.
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2012, 10:49:31 AM »


 Logged
gritsngravy
*

Reputation -17
Offline Offline

Miles Typed: 894

My Photo Gallery


Motors: BKing! - VFR




Ignore
« Reply #7 on: January 13, 2012, 10:34:32 PM »




This is what they said about the wind blast, which does not seem like an unreasonable statement:



The actual problems about instability, surging motor etc are very real and unacceptable .




Good god man no one is disputing their "findings" as being false,  my point is that naked bikes are, well, naked as in no wind protection.   To comment about wind protection or the lack of seems idiotic to me when discussing a naked bike.         Saying it's hard to hold on at 75mph + on a naked bike just seems a bit lame to me, what the hell did they expect out of a non faired machine?   I guess those "sport riders" would probably go into a fetal tuck and piss their pants if they had to ride a 70's era UJM on the freeway!  

Logged
atadaskew
*

Reputation 9
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: Two Vethpas and thome other thcooters
GPS: Venice Beach, California.
Miles Typed: 11353

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2012, 09:16:00 AM »

Actually wind blast is not equal on all naked bikes.

The way it effects you depends on riding position (feet forward vs under you), handlebar width and height, and the shape of the headlight.
A bike that has a bigger, curved headlight can provide a semblance of wind diversion over one that has a small headlight.

Case in point - my old Harley Dyna with its mini ape bars, forward foot positioning and small headlight was much harder to ride at 75mph than a Guzzi Griso.  This example provides an exaggerated difference but it does show it exists.
A Harley XR1200 was closer to the Guzzi but still not as 'good' at speed.  An MV Agusta Brutale felt like it had less wind blast than the Griso.  It has a relatively big, curved headlight.

So, it is worth mentioning.  But again, this is the smallest quibble here.  More importantly is the instability, weak suspension and poor fuel injection.  Not to mention it is not even close to its competitors in power output.
Logged

I'm hip about time, I just gotta go.
gritsngravy
*

Reputation -17
Offline Offline

Miles Typed: 894

My Photo Gallery


Motors: BKing! - VFR




Ignore
« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2012, 09:49:34 PM »

 Sleepy

Logged
falconati
you love it
*

Reputation 13
Offline Offline

Motorcycles: MV Agusta F4 1000R, Aprilia Futura
GPS: Madison, WI
Miles Typed: 4893

My Photo Gallery


Baller




Ignore
« Reply #10 on: January 15, 2012, 09:10:24 AM »

Wow, that's a lot of attitude for somebody who didn't read the article.  I did, because I have a subscription.  They mentioned instability, not wind blast.  I've owned multiple nakeds, and there's a difference.  They were getting rough air that was disrupting the rider's control of the bike, which is unacceptable.  Other naked models don't have this, so please drop the attitude, read the article, and demo one if you'd like to dispute it.  
Logged
Rogue
Menace to Society
*

Reputation -26
Online Online

Motorcycles: Buell and Honda
Miles Typed: 6207

My Photo Gallery





Ignore
« Reply #11 on: January 15, 2012, 04:43:20 PM »




The actual problems about instability, surging motor etc are very real and unacceptable .


I read one comparison test in Cycle World, and then another at Motorcycle-USA.  Neither reported the instability, surging motor isse that SR spoke of.   Headscratch
Logged

Rogue
gritsngravy
*

Reputation -17
Offline Offline

Miles Typed: 894

My Photo Gallery


Motors: BKing! - VFR




Ignore
« Reply #12 on: January 16, 2012, 07:58:09 PM »


Wow, that's a lot of attitude for somebody who didn't read the article.  I did, because I have a subscription.  They mentioned instability, not wind blast.  I've owned multiple nakeds, and there's a difference.  They were getting rough air that was disrupting the rider's control of the bike, which is unacceptable.  Other naked models don't have this, so please drop the attitude, read the article, and demo one if you'd like to dispute it.  





Um....... Ata posted the article in his first post and I did read it..... Ata even quoted what was said about WIND BLAST if you check his subsequent posts which raises the question of who was actually doing the reading.   Not sure about the "attitude" comment I love bantering with Ata, chill & relax man we're talking about what are essentially toys.     Bikes are about fun and BSing on forums with others is just part of it.  

If the cb1000r is an unstable surging mess so be it I own no stock in honda....in 30 years of riding I've owned many makes new and used.    I do agree with Rogues comment and will add the british mags I've read never mentioned anything like the SR article.   As far as riding the cb I would have but for me it wasn't the 'naked'  experience I was looking for.   One ride on a new left over bking at a tasty 5k off msrp  hooked me.   And yes the fueling is fine and its rock solid at all speeds and conditions.   Bigok
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  



ST.N

Copyright © 2001 - 2012 Sport-Touring.Net.
All rights reserved.

SimplePortal 2.3.1 © 2008-2009, SimplePortal